Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40585709›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Translational Success and Pharmacoeconomic Lessons of Pandemic-Driven Drug Repurposing.

Kelechi W Elechi, Adekunle F Adeoye, Aliyu O Olaniyi, Olukunle O Akanbi, Isaiah Olumeko, Chukwuma G Udensi, Toluwanimi J Kolapo, Vincent U Barrah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelechi W ElechiIntegrated Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA.
Adekunle F AdeoyeMathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.
Aliyu O OlaniyiGeriatrics, Stepping Hill Hospital, Manchester, GBR.
Olukunle O AkanbiGraduate College of Business Leadership, National Louis University, Florida, USA.
Isaiah OlumekoPharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Houston, Houston, USA.
Chukwuma G UdensiMolecular Biosciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA.
Toluwanimi J KolapoBiology, Miami University, Oxford, USA.
Vincent U BarrahPublic Health, Chicago State University, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic spurred an unprecedented wave of drug repurposing as scientists and clinicians raced to find immediate treatment options for a novel disease. This narrative review examines how those crisis-driven repurposing efforts fared. It highlights key successes and failures in translating research into practice and assessing their pharmacoeconomic implications in high-income health systems. It also distills lessons to guide future pandemic preparedness and improve equitable global access to effective treatments. We performed a broad literature search across major databases (2020-2025) to identify studies and reports on repurposed COVID-19 therapies and health economic outcomes. While repurposing accelerated the delivery of treatments, results were mixed: a handful of existing drugs, such as the widely available steroid dexamethasone, that reduced mortality, emerged as life-saving interventions, but many other initially promising drugs ultimately showed limited or no efficacy. Agile translational research frameworks like large adaptive trials proved critical, separating truly effective therapies from many speculative candidates. From a pharmacoeconomic perspective, repurposed therapies yielded cost-effective breakthroughs and costly disappointments. High-income countries invested substantial resources in repurposed drugs. In some cases, this approach provided rapid access to evidence-based care but also led to significant spending on unproven interventions, underscoring the importance of timely evidence generation and prudent resource allocation. Disparities in access to effective therapies between wealthy and low-resource settings highlight a persistent global equity challenge. The collective experience of pandemic drug repurposing provides a pragmatic blueprint for balancing urgency with scientific rigor, economic prudence, and equity. This will ultimately guide how we might better pivot from crisis to cure in future global health emergencies.

Indexed as

adaptive platform trialscovid-19dexamethasonedrug repurposingpharmacoeconomicsremdesivirtranslational science

Identifiers

PMID40585709
PMCPMC12205848

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.