ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
MRI's evolving role in rectal cancer in the era of personalized medicine.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Theranostics in the management of colorectal cancer.Discover nano · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent decades have seen great advances in the diagnosis and management of rectal cancer, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become pivotal for decision making. New treatments include total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced disease, with neoadjuvant immunotherapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy alone offering viable alternatives to conventional chemoradiotherapy. Minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic techniques and organ preservation strategies after neoadjuvant therapy have expanded personalized therapeutic options. In this scenario, where it is crucial to tailor treatment to individual patients, MRI plays a critical role in guiding management, including local staging and risk stratification, restaging, and surveillance. However, variability in assessments and limitations in identifying key clinical features (e.g., early-stage tumors, lymph-node involvement, extramural vascular invasion, and responses to treatment) are challenges that have not yet been overcome. This review provides an overview of the current role of MRI in rectal cancer, emphasizing how imaging can refine tailored treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. It highlights the prognostic and decision-making implications of MRI-based features of local tumor spread (depth of invasion, mesorectal fascia involvement, lymph-node metastases, and perineural and lymphatic invasion) and risk of systemic dissemination (extramural vascular invasion and tumor deposits). It discusses MRI's role in supporting new therapeutic strategies (total neoadjuvant therapy, organ preservation, etc.), evaluating its limitations in assessing some key histological, molecular, and genetic features of rectal cancer as well as in assessing the response to treatment. Finally, it ponders the potential roles of advanced MRI sequences, artificial intelligence, and radiomics in clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40586896What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.