ArticleBehavior research methods2025
A Japanese LDA model for automatic clustering analysis of semantic verbal fluency tests.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the semantic variant of verbal fluency tests (VFTs), clustering analysis has become popular for examining the semantic structure. While the computational psycholinguistics approach has recently drawn attention to increasing the reproducibility of clustering analysis, such an approach is not available in all languages. To make the computational approach available in the Japanese language, we constructed a Japanese latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model. Our LDA model enables researchers and clinicians to objectively quantify the associative relationships of words, thereby making it possible to automatically detect semantic clusters. We conducted the semantic VFT with healthy young Japanese adults to examine the validity of our LDA model. We performed clustering analyses using the computational approach with our LDA model and the conventional manual approach with human coders. The results showed that the LDA model identified semantic clusters, as did the human coders. In addition, we demonstrated for the first time that response intervals within a cluster were significantly shorter than those outside of clusters, regardless of the clustering approaches. This indicates that both approaches reflect a broadly accepted assumption that closer semantic relations require less processing time. However, LDA-based clustering produced, on average, larger clusters than human-based clustering did, indicating that the LDA model captured semantic relationships between words that human coders would not recognize. Taken together, the present results demonstrated the validity of our LDA model. We hope that our LDA model fosters the use of the computational linguistic approach in semantic VFTs with Japanese participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.