Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40586964›Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2025

The Impact of Antibiofilm Strategies in Controlling Microbial Colonization.

Binimol Jacob Karayamparambil, Kayeen Vadakkan, Sinjumol Thomas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Binimol Jacob KarayamparambilDepartment of Botany, Carmel College, Mala, Thrissur, Kerala, 680732, India.
Kayeen VadakkanAmala Integrated Medical Research Department (AIMRD), Amala Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS), Amala Nagar, Thrissur, Kerala, 680555, India. kayeenvadakkan@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8287-6038
Sinjumol ThomasDepartment of Botany, Carmel College, Mala, Thrissur, Kerala, 680732, India. sunithatom23@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4907-9197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms play a crucial role in persistent infections and antibiotic resistance owing to their structural complexity and protective matrices. This review focuses on current antibiofilm techniques to avoid or inhibit microbial colonisation. Key approaches involve the employing of antimicrobial peptides, quorum sensing inhibitors, quorum quenching agents, matrix-degrading enzymes, nanoparticles, and bacteriophages. These techniques inhibit biofilm formation, increase antimicrobial penetration, and impede biofilm integrity. The focus is on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, two clinically relevant biofilm-forming bacteria. Quorum quenching, which interrupts microbial communication networks, has emerged as a viable technique for inhibiting pathogenesis and biofilm growth. Efforts have been made to identify various compounds used for inhibiting quorum Sensing. Various plant extracts and enzymes have been proven to affect quorum sensing profoundly. Another strategy is to inhibit the genes responsible for biofilm formation. Certain genes can be upregulated or downregulated to prevent biofilm formation, or component production can be minimised. A multidisciplinary strategy that incorporates these tactics can give effective approaches for treating biofilm-related illnesses in healthcare and industrial settings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusAntimicrobial PeptidesBacteriophagesHumansQuorum SensingAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Peptides

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.