Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40587011›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2025

Ethical Issues in International Research in Pediatric Psychology: Challenges and Opportunities.

Rocío de la Vega, Eileen Chaves, Tatiana Lund, Gerald P Koocher, Line Caes

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rocío de la VegaDepartment of Psychology, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain. rocio.delavega@uma.es.
Eileen ChavesDepartment of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Tatiana LundDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Gerald P KoocherDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Psychiatry at Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School Bioethics Center, Boston, USA.
Line CaesDivision of Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly expanding international scope of pediatric psychology presents significant collaborative opportunities as well as ethical challenges. In a quest of common ethics terminology and primary ethical considerations across international borders, we conducted an online survey with open-ended questions focusing on procedures essential to obtaining ethical approval for research with pediatric patients. Participants from 14 countries responded. This report provides an overview of some key international differences and challenges while providing recommendations for addressing each aspect. Key factors include ensuring international collaborators begin ethical planning from inception of the project; identifying pediatric ethics thought and policy leaders in each country; and confirming pertinent policies and procedures in each location.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchEthics, ResearchInternational CooperationInternationalityPsychology, ChildChildHumansAdverse eventsEthicsInternational researchPediatric psychologyVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID40587011
PMCPMC12638410

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.