Evidence mapPaperPMID 40587474Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Racial disparities in continuous glucose monitoring-based 60-min glucose predictions among people with type 1 diabetes.

Helene Bei Thomsen, Livie Yumeng Li, Anders Aasted Isaksen, Benjamin Lebiecka-Johansen, Charline Bour, Guy Fagherazzi, William P T M van Doorn, Tibor V Varga, Adam Hulman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Helene Bei ThomsenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9059-3038
Livie Yumeng LiDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8579-6228
Anders Aasted IsaksenSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Benjamin Lebiecka-JohansenSteno Diabetes Center Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Charline BourDepartment of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Guy FagherazziDepartment of Population Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg.
William P T M van DoornCARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Tibor V VargaCopenhagen Health Complexity Center, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adam HulmanDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3969-1000

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-Hispanic white (White) populations are overrepresented in medical studies. Potential healthcare disparities can happen when machine learning models, used in diabetes technologies, are trained on data from primarily White patients. We aimed to evaluate algorithmic fairness in glucose predictions. This study utilized continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from 101 White and 104 Black participants with type 1 diabetes collected by the JAEB Center for Health Research, US. Long short-term memory (LSTM) deep learning models were trained on 11 datasets of different proportions of White and Black participants and tailored to each individual using transfer learning to predict glucose 60 minutes ahead based on 60-minute windows. Root mean squared errors (RMSE) were calculated for each participant. Linear mixed-effect models were used to investigate the association between racial composition and RMSE while accounting for age, sex, and training data size. A median of 9 weeks (IQR: 7, 10) of CGM data was available per participant. The divergence in performance (RMSE slope by proportion) was not statistically significant for either group. However, the slope difference (from 0% White and 100% Black to 100% White and 0% Black) between groups was statistically significant (p = 0.02), meaning the RMSE increased 0.04 [0.01, 0.08] mmol/L more for Black participants compared to White participants when the proportion of White participants increased from 0 to 100% in the training data. This difference was attenuated in the transfer learned models (RMSE: 0.02 [-0.01, 0.05] mmol/L, p = 0.20). The racial composition of training data created a small statistically significant difference in the performance of the models, which was not present after using transfer learning. This demonstrates the importance of diversity in datasets and the potential value of transfer learning for developing more fair prediction models.

Identifiers

PMID40587474
PMCPMC12208448

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.