Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40588169›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of veterinary research2025

Environmental exposures and health outcomes in dogs differ according to geographic region in the United States among Dog Aging Project participants.

Janice S O'Brien, Mia Grzywinski, Courtney L Sexton, Dog Aging Project Consortium, Matthew D Dunbar, Audrey Ruple

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Janice S O'BrienPopulation Health Sciences Department, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.ORCID 0009-0003-0724-6564
Mia GrzywinskiPopulation Health Sciences Department, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Courtney L SextonPopulation Health Sciences Department, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-7459
Dog Aging Project Consortium
Matthew D DunbarCenter for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Audrey RuplePopulation Health Sciences Department, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.ORCID 0000-0002-5223-0217

Funding

The Dog Aging Project: Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Healthy Aging in Companion Dogs Competitive RevisionU19AG057377 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PROMISLOW, DANIEL EDWARD · 2018 to 2023
$29.0M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG057377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine which environmental exposures, lifestyle variables, and prevalences of health conditions within the Dog Aging Project population differed by geographic region. Methods: For this cross-sectional descriptive study, owner-reported environmental and lifestyle factors from 47,444 individuals enrolled in the Dog Aging Project cohort from January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2023, were examined across census regions, and 95% CIs were computed for each individual factor across the regions. Results: Analyses indicated high variation in the characteristics of dogs' environments across the US regions, including both inside and outside of the home. Certain types of diseases disproportionately affect dogs in some regions: infectious diseases were most prevalent in the Northeast (49%; 95% CI, 48% to 50%), dental disease was highest in the West (46%; 95% CI, 45% to 47%), and skin conditions were most prevalent in the South (45%; 95% CI, 44% to 45%). Dog activity levels did not vary significantly across regions. Conclusions: There are regional differences in lifestyle and environmental exposures experienced by companion dogs across the US, such as pesticides and weed treatments applied to yards, swimming water sources, and home heat sources, whereas other exposures do not differ across regions. The prevalence of some health conditions, like infectious/parasitic diseases, dental disease, and skin conditions, varied by regions, whereas others, like cancer, neurologic, and gastrointestinal diseases, showed no regional variation. These findings inform future hypothesis-driven studies of environmental health risks of dogs, which are relevant to translational research. Clinical Relevance: There are regional variations in exposures that may contribute to differences in the prevalence of health conditions found in companion dog populations.

Indexed as

AgingDog DiseasesEnvironmental ExposureAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesDogsFemaleLife StyleMalePrevalenceUnited Statescompanion dog healthDog Aging Projectenvironmental exposuregeographic variationOne Health

Identifiers

PMID40588169
PMCPMC12324818

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.