Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40588294›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2025

Towards equitable partnerships in global health research: experiences from Ethiopia, Uganda, Lao PDR and Vietnam.

Kassahun Alemu, Della Berhanu, Anna Bergström, Dinh Phuong Hoa, Stefan Swartling Peterson, Bounfeng Phoummalaysith, Goran Tomson, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze, Lars Åke Persson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kassahun AlemuUniversity of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-5178
Della BerhanuDisease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK.
Anna BergströmDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4084-2336
Dinh Phuong HoaViet Nam Pediatric Association, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Stefan Swartling PetersonDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Bounfeng PhoummalaysithMinistry of Health, Warsaw, Poland.
Goran TomsonDepartment of Learning, Informatics Management, and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rhoda Kitti WanyenzeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Lars Åke PerssonDisease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, England, UK lars.persson@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0710-7954

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equitable partnerships in global health research can counteract power imbalances in this field. Theoretical perspectives have been provided on equitable global health partnerships, but there are few reports from researchers actively engaged in such partnerships. This article departs from the experiences of four long-term global health research partnerships, two in Africa and two in Asia. It describes the challenges in enhancing an equitable research partnership and how these were addressed. The examples illustrate that funders can play a pivotal role in counteracting power imbalances by assigning leadership roles and directing primary funding to institutions where the research occurs. Such a transition requires adaptations and a new mindset on both sides. Embedded research capacity enhancement, part of all four partnership examples, is essential in correcting power imbalances. Capacity enhancement should preferably include enhancing the broader research ecosystem within the partner university, across academic institutions in the country or beyond. The development of mutual trust and respect takes time and requires long-term engagement, transparency in budgeting, project planning and all steps of the research process. Reciprocity in learning is important for all partners. It may include twinning of research students, joint degrees and efforts to bring research findings into policy and practice in all partner contexts. The partnership examples illustrate the achievements and challenges in bringing new research evidence into policy and practice, where early involvement and continuous buy-in by policymakers are crucial.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchGlobal HealthInternational CooperationCapacity BuildingEthiopiaHumansLaosUgandaVietnamGlobal HealthHealth policyInterdisciplinary ResearchPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID40588294
PMCPMC12211826

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.