ArticleBJU international2025
Renal clearance of fluorescent agents can compromise image-guided surgery along the urinary tract.
Article in BJU international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo study the effect of renally cleared fluorescent agents on image-guided surgery along the urinary tract by using the renally cleared, non-tumour-specific, fluorescent dye fluorescein. SUBJECTS AND
methodsSixteen patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with lymph node dissection received an intradermal injection of fluorescein. The slow-release of the fluorescein from the skin into the lymph- and bloodstream were used as a pharmacokinetic model for slow release from receptor-targeted agents. The presence of fluorescein in the urine and the surgical dissection planes around the prostate (representative of cancer margins) during RARP were evaluated. Suction, gauze and irrigation were used to try and reduce fluorescent background signals according to standard operating protocol.
resultsFluorescein was detected in the urine in the bedside catheter bag after a median of 1.3 h after agent administration and in the surgical field after opening the bladder neck as part of RARP (median of 2.4 h after injection). Suction and application of gauze helped to reduce contamination, but suction combined with irrigation with lukewarm NaCl 0.9% was shown to be most effective. Fluorescein accumulation was seen in the tissue surrounding the bladder neck in 80% of patients.
conclusionsRenally excreted fluorescent agents risk contamination of the surgical field and possible dissection margins along the urinary tract, a feature that, without proper counter measures, could compromise the accuracy of intra-operative imaging by creating false-positive findings. A clear example of this was the observed bladder neck staining with fluorescein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.