ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology reports2025
Revisiting the Gateway Drug Hypothesis for Cannabis: A Secondary Analysis of a Nationwide Survey Among Community Users in Japan.
Article in Neuropsychopharmacology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Response to "Concerns Regarding Masataka et al.'s 'Revisiting the Gateway Drug Hypothesis for Cannabis'".Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2026Article
- Revisiting the Gateway Drug Hypothesis for Cannabis: A Secondary Analysis of a Nationwide Survey Among Community Users in Japan.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2025Article
- Clarifying the Gateway Hypothesis and Conflict of Interest in Cannabis Research.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2025Article
- Concerns Regarding Masataka et al.'s "Revisiting the Gateway Drug Hypothesis for Cannabis: A Secondary Analysis of a Nationwide Survey Among Community Users in Japan".Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimCannabis has historically been used for medicinal and industrial purposes, but is strictly regulated worldwide due to the psychoactive effects of THC. In Japan, cannabis is frequently labeled a "gateway drug," yet strong causal evidence for progression to other substances is limited. This study investigates whether cannabis acts as a gateway drug among Japanese users.
methodsAn anonymous online survey was conducted in January 2021 with 3900 individuals reporting lifetime cannabis use in Japan. Participants were recruited via social media. The survey gathered data on demographics, cannabis and other substance use history, order of substance initiation, psychiatric background, and criminal records. A Sankey diagram visualized substance use progression, and odds ratios were calculated to assess the likelihood of using other substances following cannabis use.
resultsOf all respondents, 81.5% were male, with the largest age group being 20-24. Tobacco and alcohol were the most common initial substances, while cannabis was typically the third. Odds for subsequent use of alcohol, tobacco, methamphetamine, and other illicit drugs after cannabis use were 1.25, 0.77, 0.08, and 0.78, respectively, suggesting low probabilities of progression. Nearly half of those who reported cannabis as their third drug did not use other substances afterward.
conclusionCannabis use in Japan typically follows alcohol and tobacco, and rarely leads to further drug use. These findings challenge the gateway hypothesis in the Japanese context. Shared vulnerabilities and strict drug policies may shape these patterns. Further research is warranted to explore the impact of legal changes on drug use behavior. REGISTRY AND REGISTRATION NUMBER OF THE STUDY/TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.