ArticleEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2025
Key elements of follow-up care after acute pulmonary embolism focusing on long-term sequelae: a Delphi study among European experts.
Article in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Capturing the late complications of venous thromboembolism.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsA considerable proportion of patients develop long-term sequelae after an acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Beyond chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), current guidelines provide limited guidance regarding a structured approach for assessment and management of these patients. This study aimed to establish a framework of multidisciplinary follow-up care of PE-survivors. METHODS AND
resultsA Delphi study was conducted among a multidisciplinary panel of PE specialists from across Europe to gather expert opinions, and where possible reach consensus, on key aspects of PE follow-up care. Two rounds of surveys were distributed among 45 venous thromboembolism (VTE) experts, with 39 completing both rounds. Consensus was reached that follow-up of PE survivors should address the entire spectrum of post-PE sequelae, i.e. CTEPH, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease, but also all other presentations of the post-PE syndrome. Routine assessment at 3 months should involve patient-reported outcome measures, including quality of life. A single, uniform protocol was preferred over locally adapted approaches. Earlier follow-up, prior to the 3-month mark, to detect post-PE sequelae was not considered necessary for most patient subgroups. Right heart catheterization to confirm CTEPH should be reserved for specialized pulmonary hypertension centres, while other diagnostic modalities such as computed tomography, V/Q scan, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and transthoracic echocardiography can be performed in non-referral centres.
conclusionThis Delphi study among a panel of VTE experts across Europe describes a consensus-based framework for structured follow-up care for PE-survivors, emphasizing the need for a standardized, multidisciplinary approach to detecting long-term sequelae of PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.