Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40590355›Full record

ArticleEndocrine connections2025

Predictors of therapeutic failure in GH and prolactin co-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Marta Araujo-Castro, Betina Biagetti, Edelmiro Menéndez, Iría Novoa-Testa, Fernando Cordido, Víctor Rodríguez Berrocal, Eider Pascual-Corrales, Fernando Guerrero-Pérez, Almudena Vicente, Rogelio García-Centeno and 34 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Approach to the patient: precision medicine-guided evaluation and treatment of acromegaly.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  2. Current controversies in acromegaly care.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

44 authors.

Edelmiro Menéndez
Iría Novoa-Testa
Fernando Cordido
Víctor Rodríguez Berrocal
Almudena Vicente
Rogelio García-Centeno
Laura González
María Dolores Ollero García
Ana Irigaray Echarri
María Dolores Moure Rodríguez
Cristina Novo-Rodríguez
María Calatayud
Rocío Villar-Taibo
Ignacio Bernabéu
Cristina Alvarez-Escola
Carmen Tenorio Jimenéz
Pablo Abellán-Galiana
Eva Venegas
Inmaculada González-Molero
Pedro Iglesias
Concepción Blanco
Fernando Vidal-Ostos De Lara
María Paz de Miguel Novoa
Elena López-Mezquita Torres
Felicia Hanzu
Cristina Lamas
Silvia Aznar Rodríguez
Anna Aulinas
José María Recio
María Dolores Aviles-Pérez
Miguel Antonio Sampedro Núñez
Rosa Camara
Miguel Paja Fano
Carmen Fajardo
Luís Cardoso
Pedro Marques
Elena Martínez-Sáez
Ignacio Ruz-Caracuel
Mónica Marazuela
Manel Puig-Domingo

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate which factors are associated with a higher probability of failure to surgical and first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs) treatment in patients with growth hormone and prolactin co-secreting pituitary adenomas (GH&PRL-PAs). Methods: Acromegaly patients with GH&PRL-PAs included in the ACRO-SPAIN study were enrolled. GH&PRL-PAs were defined as tumors with serum PRL levels above the upper limit of normal and positive immunostaining for GH and PRL, or with PRL levels ≥100 ng/mL when immunostaining data were not available. Results: A total of 126 acromegaly patients with GH&PRL-PAs who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary surgery were included, and 42.1% (n = 53) were biochemically cured at the immediate postoperative evaluation. Knosp grade >2 (odds ratio (OR) 3.48, 95% CI 1.28-9.38), higher serum GH (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) and IGF-1 (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.05-2.45) levels were associated with a lower probability of surgical cure. Sixty-eight patients received first-line medical therapy as follows: fgSRLs in monotherapy (n = 22), fgSRL plus cabergoline (n = 37), cabergoline in monotherapy (n = 7) and pegvisomant in monotherapy (n = 2). Among the cases treated with fgSRL in monotherapy, 18.2% (n = 4/22) were resistant. We identified as predictors of fgSRL resistance (in monotherapy and combined with cabergoline) a Knosp grade >2 (OR 8.75, P = 0.003), high GH levels at acromegaly diagnosis (OR 1.02, P = 0.031) and higher postoperative GH levels (OR 1.05, P = 0.006), but no predictors of response to fgSRL in monotherapy were identified. Conclusion: The clinical predictors of surgical failure and of fgSRL resistance in patients with GH&PRL-PAs are similar to those described in acromegaly without PRL, co-secretion. Significance statement: In this article focused on GH&PRL pituitary adenomas, we found that a Knosp grade >2, and higher serum GH and IGF-1 levels were associated with a lower probability of surgical cure in these tumors. Regarding the response to fgSRL in monotherapy, 18% of the patients with GH&PRL pituitary adenomas were classified as resistant. Knosp grade >2 (OR 8.75, P = 0.003), high GH levels at acromegaly diagnosis (OR 1.02, P = 0.031), and higher postoperative GH levels (OR 1.05, P = 0.006) were predictors of non-response to fgSRL (monotherapy or combined with cabergoline), while no predictors of response to fgSRL in monotherapy were identified. Thus, we concluded the clinical predictors of surgical failure and of fgSRL resistance in patients with GH&PRL-PAs are similar to those described in acromegaly without PRL co-secretion.

Indexed as

acromegalygrowth hormoneprolactin co-secreting pituitary adenomasomatostatin receptor ligandssurgical remission

Identifiers

PMID40590355
PMCPMC12268987

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.