ReviewDiabetes technology & therapeutics2025
Practical Considerations and Implementation of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.
Review in Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence on commercially available automated insulin delivery systems in people with type 1 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Open-source automated insulin delivery shows comparable glycemic outcomes to a commercial hybrid closed-loop system in real-world type 1 pediatric diabetes care: a retrospective cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.Pediatric diabetes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) is in a new era of implementation challenges and opportunities for people with diabetes (PWD) and healthcare providers (HCPs). Beyond technologic variation, cost, access, and HCP endorsement/experience lead to uneven uptake of AID technologies, and attenuate universal ease of use. For AID to be broadly implemented, we must prioritize the lived experience for PWD, and consider how to alleviate burden to promote holistic wellbeing. Expectations and education help HCPs and PWD navigate the similarities and differences between AID devices, and help find common ties: users need to give the system time to work, learn to trust it, and not try to "trick" the system. Despite these learnings, disparities in uptake exist, both in clinical trials and in routine clinical care. Strategies to proactively address AID disparities are needed at multiple levels, all of which increase in importance as AID becomes more common for people with type 2 diabetes. Further, broader implementation will require comprehensive healthcare system integration efforts, including new data solutions. Overall, the success of AID requires ongoing transformation of clinical paradigms, with lockstep alignment between PWD and their families, healthcare professionals, researchers, funders, policy makers, and industry partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.