Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40590806›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025

Fundus Refraction Offset as a Personalized Biomarker for 12-Year Risk of Retinal Detachment.

Fabian Yii, Ian J C MacCormick, Niall Strang, Miguel O Bernabeu, Tom MacGillivray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabian YiiRobert O. Curle Ophthalmology Suite, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Ian J C MacCormickRobert O. Curle Ophthalmology Suite, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Niall StrangDepartment of Vision Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Miguel O BernabeuCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Tom MacGillivrayRobert O. Curle Ophthalmology Suite, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of a novel anatomical metric of ametropia-fundus refraction offset (FRO)-in stratifying the risk of retinal detachment (RD) or breaks, beyond the influence of risk factors including spherical equivalent refraction (SER). Methods: Participants from the UK Biobank with no prior history of RD/breaks were analyzed (n = 9320). The onset of RD/breaks over a 12-year follow-up period was determined based on linked healthcare data. A previously trained deep learning model was applied to each fundus photograph to predict SER. FRO was defined as the error in the fundus-predicted SER, with a negative value indicating a relatively myopic-looking fundus. Cox regression was used to examine the association of baseline FRO with RD/breaks-adjusting for baseline SER, baseline age, sex, and cataract surgery during follow-up. In a subgroup of participants (n = 7127) with high-quality optical coherence tomography scans, we additionally adjusted for baseline macular thickness (MT). All analyses initially considered any RD/breaks as the event, followed by rhegmatogenous RD/breaks. Results: The mean (SD) baseline age was 54.8 (8.2) years. Sixty-four participants developed RD/breaks (of any subcategory), with a mean (SD) of 7.0 (3.3) years between baseline and disease onset. A more negative baseline FRO was independently associated with an increased risk of any RD/breaks (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50-0.87, P = 0.003) and rhegmatogenous RD/breaks (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.45-0.82, P = 0.001). Similar independent associations were evident in the subgroup analysis that additionally adjusted for MT. Conclusions: A more negative baseline FRO is associated with a higher risk of developing RD/breaks, even among individuals with similar baseline SER and other risk factors. This demonstrates a potential benefit of shifting towards an anatomic definition of myopia.

Indexed as

Refraction, OcularRetinal DetachmentAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTomography, Optical CoherenceUnited KingdomBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40590806
PMCPMC12227021

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.