Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591456›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2025

Patient radiation safety in the intensive care unit.

Emilio Quaia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emilio QuaiaDepartment of Radiology, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-9365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this commentary review was to summarize the main research evidences on radiation exposure and to underline the best clinical and radiological practices to limit radiation exposure in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Radiological imaging is essential for management of patients in the ICU despite the risk of ionizing radiation exposure in monitoring critically ill patients, especially in those with prolonged hospitalization. In optimizing radiation exposure reduction for ICU patients, multiple parties and professionals must be considered, including hospital management, clinicians, radiographers, and radiologists. Modified diagnostic reference levels for ICU patients, based on UK guidance, may be proposed, especially considering the frequent repetition of X-ray diagnostic procedures in ICU patients. Best practices may reduce radiation exposure in ICU patients with particular emphasis on justification and radiation exposure optimization in conventional radiology, interventional radiology and fluoroscopy, CT, and nuclear medicine. CT contributes most predominately to radiation exposure in ICU patients. Low-dose (<1 mSv in effective dose) or even ultra-low-dose CT protocols, iterative reconstruction algorithms, and artificial intelligence-based innovative dose-reduction strategies could reduce radiation exposure and related oncogenic risks.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPatient SafetyRadiation ExposureHumansNeoplasmsNuclear MedicineRadiation DosageRadiologic HealthRadiologyRisk Managementcancer riskeffective doseintensive care unitjustificationoptimizationradiation exposureradiological imaging

Identifiers

PMID40591456
PMCPMC12377469

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.