Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40591571›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella and pathogenic E. coli in broiler farms, Wakiso district, Uganda.

Thomas Ssemakadde, Nalumaga Pauline Petra, Jude Collins Busingye, Joel Bazira, Kabanda Taseera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antimicrobial resistance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas SsemakaddeDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Nalumaga Pauline PetraDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1264-4910
Jude Collins BusingyeDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Joel BaziraDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Kabanda TaseeraDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic bacterial infections and the upsurge reflected in current trends of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria is a major global concern. Salmonella spp and Escherichia coli (E. coli) are the two most important food-borne pathogens of public health interest incriminated in poultry products worldwide. AMR in poultry farming poses a significant public health risk in Uganda, as the misuse and overuse of antibiotics in livestock can lead to the emergence of resistant pathogens that may transfer to humans through direct contact, consumption of contaminated poultry products, or environmental exposure, further complicating the management of infection hence necessitating constant monitoring of microbial food safety measures.

methodsThis study was a cross-sectional study that used a total of two hundred sixteen poultry samples from cloacae swabs and fecal swabs collected from broiler poultry farms. These were cultured on Chromagar TM Salmonella and Sorbitol MacConkey agar. Biochemical tests, minimum inhibitory concentration, and polymerase chain reaction were utilized. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, and Chi-square (χ²) Test statistical significance of quantitative data.

resultsA total of 40 (18.5%) Salmonella and 120 (55.6%) pathogenic E. coli were isolated while extended beta-lactamase (ESBL) production was detected in 18 Salmonella and 57 pathogenic E. coli isolates. Prevalence of blaTEM gene was expressed in 7/18 (39%) Salmonella isolates and 42/57 (73.8%) Pathogenic E. coli isolates The significant associated factors that predisposed these farms to Salmonella spp was source of poultry feeds (p-value = 0.066) while factors associated with pathogenic E. coli included contact of poultry with other birds and livestock (p-value = 0.020), movement from one pen to the other by farm-handlers (p-value = 0.017), use of untreated water (p-value = 0.018) and food contamination of commercial poultry feeds (p-value = 0.0021).

conclusionThe findings of this study highlight the significant presence of Salmonella and pathogenic E. coli in poultry farms, underscoring the potential risks to public health. The high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance observed among these isolates calls for urgent interventions to curb the misuse of antibiotics in poultry farming.

Indexed as

ChickensDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsPoultry DiseasesSalmonellaSalmonella Infections, AnimalAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFarmsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPrevalenceUgandaAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40591571
PMCPMC12212538

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.