ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Twins as the Implementation Layer of Precision Medicine in Pediatric Neurosurgery.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Review
- Distinct mechanisms drive post-antibiotic Tuberculosis relapse post-cure versus post-treatment-failure.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Digital Twins in Personalized Medicine: Bridging Innovation and Clinical Reality.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital twin technology, originally developed for engineering, is being adapted to biomedicine and healthcare. A key challenge in this process is dynamically calibrating computational models to individual patients using data collected over time. This calibration is vital for improving model-based predictions and enabling personalized medicine. Biomedical models are often complex, incorporating multiple scales of biology and both stochastic and spatially heterogeneous elements. Agent-based models, which simulate autonomous agents, such as cells, are commonly used to capture how local interactions affect system-level behaviour. However, no standard personalization methods exist for these models. The main challenge is bridging the gap between clinically measurable macrostates (e.g. blood pressure and heart rate) and the detailed microstate data (e.g. cellular processes) needed to run the model. In this article, we propose an algorithm that applies the ensemble Kalman filter, a classic data-assimilation technique, at the macrostate level. We then link the Kalman update at the macrostate to corresponding updates at the microstate level, ensuring that the resulting microstates are compatible with the desired macrostates and consistent with the model's dynamics. This approach improves the personalization of complex biomedical models and enhances model-based forecasts for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.