Trial reportScientific reports2025
Human clinical trial of plasmapheresis effects on biomarkers of aging (efficacy and safety trial).
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasma-based strategies for systemic rejuvenation: critical perspectives on clinical translation.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Turning back time: a comprehensive list of interventions that decrease next-generation epigenetic aging clocks in humans.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Corticosteroid-Refractory Multiple Sclerosis Relapses: Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Integration into Clinical Practice.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plasmapheresis is a medical procedure that separates plasma from blood cells, potentially removing pro-aging factors from circulation. Some studies suggest it may have rejuvenating effects by altering biomarkers of aging, but evidence on its impact on epigenetic aging in humans is limited. This study aimed to assess whether plasmapheresis without volume replacement with young plasma or albumin affects epigenetic age and other biomarkers in healthy adults. An automatic plasma collection system, the Haemonetics PCS2, was used for plasmapheresis. Healthy blood donors were divided into two groups using stratified randomization in a cross-over study with subjects undergoing either 8 plasmaphereses (8 pp) or 4 plasmaphereses (4 pp) for an 18-week period, with a minimum interval between plasmaphereses of 2 weeks (14 days). Samples were tested for biochemical, hematological analyses and epigenetic clocks. We documented the alteration in serum minerals, decreased serum lipids, mainly total cholesterol, non-HDL, triglycerides, apolipoprotein A levels, total proteins and albumin. Among hematologic parameters, we found an increase in Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) and Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC). No significant epigenetic rejuvenation was observed based on epigenetic clock measurements. Instead, plasmapheresis was associated with increases in DNAmGrimAge, the Hannum clock, and the Dunedin Pace of Aging. Plasmapheresis can rapidly change the levels of pro-inflammatory and other pro-aging molecules in the circulation. However, the selected protocol has not provided conclusive data supporting benefits. Based on epigenetic clock parameters, it may accelerate epigenetic aging. More research into the long-term safety of this specific protocol is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.