ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
High-dimensional item response theory analysis of patient-reported outcomes in total knee arthroplasty.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Measurement Precision of Patient-Reported Outcomes Using Item Response Theory.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a Bayesian multidimensional hierarchical item response theory (MHIRT) model to improve patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Traditional unidimensional scoring fails to capture the multifaceted nature of recovery. Our model uncovers latent traits and inter-item relationships directly from PROMs such as the OKS and the EQ-5D-3L, without relying on predefined subscales. MHIRT flexibly decomposes PROMs into clinically meaningful traits like pain, mobility, self-care, and confidence. These traits captured more domain-specific variation, showed stronger sensitivity to temporal changes, and better reflected demographic factors than traditional total scores. The model was trained on a large NHS dataset and externally validated on PROMs from the moveUP digital platform. In predictive modeling of postoperative outcomes, MHIRT-derived features consistently outperformed unidimensional scores and conventional multidimensional IRT models. These findings suggest that MHIRT offers a potentially interpretable framework for tracking recovery and predicting health outcomes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.