ArticleScientific reports2025
Enhancing the YOLOv8 model for realtime object detection to ensure online platform safety.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing Detection Reliability in Safety-Critical Computer Vision: Transfer Learning and Hyperparameter Tuning with Multi-Task Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In today's digital environment, effectively detecting and censoring harmful and offensive objects such as weapons, addictive substances, and violent content on online platforms is increasingly important for user safety. This study introduces an Enhanced Object Detection (EOD) model that builds upon the YOLOv8-m architecture to improve the identification of such harmful objects in complex scenarios. Our key contributions include enhancing the cross-stage partial fusion blocks and incorporating three additional convolutional blocks into the model head, leading to better feature extraction and detection capabilities. Utilizing a public dataset covering six categories of harmful objects, our EOD model achieves superior performance with precision, recall, and mAP50 scores of 0.88, 0.89, and 0.92 on standard test data, and 0.84, 0.74, and 0.82 on challenging test cases-surpassing existing deep learning approaches. Furthermore, we employ explainable AI techniques to validate the model's confidence and decision-making process. These advancements not only enhance detection accuracy but also set a new benchmark for harmful object detection, significantly contributing to the safety measures across various online platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.