Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593356›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2025

Fast mapping in hominids.

Dahliane Labertoniere, Vanessa A D Wilson, Carla Pascual-Guàrdia, Katrin Skoruppa, Klaus Zuberbühler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dahliane LabertoniereDepartment of Comparative Cognition, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. dahliane.labertoniere@ens.psl.eu.
Vanessa A D WilsonDepartment of Comparative Cognition, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Carla Pascual-GuàrdiaDepartment of Comparative Cognition, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Katrin Skoruppa *Institute of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Klaus Zuberbühler *Department of Comparative Cognition, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Funding

National Centre of Competence in Research Evolving Language 51NF40_18088Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung N603-18-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast mapping is essential when children acquire language, but whether the required cognition is uniquely human or shared with animals is debated. Although documented in dogs and cats, both species have a history of domestication of social cognition, so that it remains unclear whether fast mapping is naturally present in non-domesticated animals. Here, we used an eye-tracking paradigm to test three species of hominids - gorillas, orangutans and humans - in their ability to rapidly learn to associate novel sounds with objects in their everyday noisy environment. The task was difficult for all participants, but while adult humans showed evidence of fast mapping, we could not detect any sign of learning in the other hominids. These species differences could have trivial causes, such as problems with attention or motivation, but it is also possible that fast mapping requires a preexisting lexicon before becoming an effective learning mechanism, or that it has simply evolved after the shared ancestor of all great apes.

Indexed as

Association LearningGorilla gorillaHominidaePongoAdultAnimalsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultComparative cognitionFast mappingLanguage acquisitionLanguage evolutionMeaningMental representationWord learning

Identifiers

PMID40593356
PMCPMC12213842

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.