ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025
Microaneurysm Counting as a Biomarker for the Hyperperfusion Stage of Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- One-Year Progression of Capillary Nonperfusion in Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Using Noninvasive Imaging: The CHART Study.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to investigate the utility of microaneurysm (MA) counting as a tool for characterizing the hyperperfusion stage of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and to examine the hypothesis that MAs can serve as a surrogate biomarker for the presence of intraretinal microvascular abnormalities (IRMAs).
methodsForty-nine (n = 49) eyes with type 2 diabetes mellitus with NPDR were included in this analysis: 12 with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) levels 43 and 37 with levels 47-53. Automated MA detection was performed using the RetmarkerDR software (Retmarker SA, Meteda Group, Italy), alongside manual detection, both done in the central retina (field 2). Based on MA counts, microaneurysm turnover (MAT) was computed. IRMAs were manually counted based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) angiography on PLEX® Elite 9000 (ZEISS, Dublin, CA, USA). The statistically significant differences between ETDRS groups were studied by comparing Mann-Whitney U test p values (significance value < 0.05). The correlation between the presence of MAs and IRMAs and MAT and IRMAs was examined using Spearman correlation analysis.
resultsThere was an observed increase in the number of IRMAs, MAs, and MAT values as NPDR progressed, independently of the counting method used. Specifically, this increase was noted when transitioning from ETDRS groups characterized by the predominance of the hypoperfusion stage (ETDRS 43) to those associated with the hyperperfusion stage (ETDRS 47-53). When MAs were counted manually, a moderate correlation was identified between the number of MAs and the presence of IRMAs (ρ = 0.40; p value = 0.005). Additionally, a similar correlation was found between MAT and the presence of IRMAs (ρ = 0.43; p value = 0.002).
conclusionsThis study underscores the potential relevance of MAs as a pivotal indicator of the hyperperfusion stage of NPDR and supports their role as surrogate biomarkers for IRMAs. These results suggest a role for MA counting in the assessment and management of diabetic eye disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.