ArticleScientific reports2025
Identifying real time surveillance indicators to estimate COVID-19 hospital admissions in Colorado during and after the public health emergency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recommendations for the analysis of leading indicators in epidemic surveillance.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Rocky Mountain West COVID-19 Modeling: A Descriptive Assessment of Public Health Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic to Endemic Transition in Summer 2022.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Questions remain about how best to focus surveillance efforts for COVID-19 and other emerging respiratory diseases. We used an archive of COVID-19 data in Colorado from October 2020 to March 2024 to reconstruct seven real-time surveillance indicators. We assessed how well the indicators predicted 7-day average COVID-19 hospital admissions, a key indicator of outbreak severity, using machine learning and regression models, and used cross-correlation analysis to identify leading indicators. We found that hospital-based surveillance metrics, including real-time hospital census data and emergency-department based syndromic surveillance, were among the best predictors of COVID-19 hospital admissions during and after the public health emergency (PHE). While wastewater was a weaker individual predictor, its removal from our multi-indicator models resulted in a decrease in model performance, suggesting that wastewater provides important, unique information. Likewise, we found that test positivity, while imprecise, can serve as a leading indicator of COVID-19 hospitalizations. These findings suggest hospital-based reporting should be a surveillance priority, and that wastewater surveillance and test positivity can improve situational awareness for COVID-19 in Colorado. In contrast, case reporting was not found to be essential to real-time monitoring of COVID-19 hospitalizations in Colorado. The generalizability to other regions and respiratory illnesses warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.