Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40593962›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging federated learning and edge computing for pandemic-resilient healthcare.

Atlanta Choudhury, Kandarpa Kumar Sarma, Vyacheslav Gulvanskii, Dmitrii Kaplun, Lachit Dutta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Atlanta ChoudhuryDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, Assam, India.
Kandarpa Kumar SarmaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, Assam, India.
Vyacheslav GulvanskiiFundamental Foundations of Intelligent Systems Laboratory, Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI", 197022, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Dmitrii KaplunArtificial Intelligence Research Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, 221116, Xuzhou, China. dikaplun@etu.ru.
Lachit DuttaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Gauhati University, Guwahati, 781014, Assam, India.

Funding

SERB, DST, Government of India SUR/2022/001704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The universal demand for the development and deployment of responsive medical infrastructure and damage control techniques, including the application of technology, is the foremost necessity that emerged immediately in the post-pandemic era. Numerous technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI)-aided decision-making and the Internet of Things (IoT), have been rendered indispensable for such applications. Federated learning (FL) is a popular approach used to enhance AI-driven decision support systems and maintain decentralized learning. As part of a bio-safety norms observance setup, IoT, edge computing, and FL tools can be configured to monitor social distance norms, face-mask use, contact tracing, and cyber-attacks. The design of a pandemic-compliant mechanism for keeping an eye on protocol observance of virus-triggered infectious disease and contact tracing is the subject of this study. The mechanism is based on edge computing, FL frameworks, and a variety of sensors that are connected via IoT. We employ a variety of deep learning pre-trained models (DPTM) as benchmark techniques to compare the performance of the proposed YOLOv4 and SENet attention layer combination. This combination is deployed on a FL framework that is executed using a server and Grove AI-Raspberry Pi 4 blocks act as nodes as part of a human residential premises. The models include the RESNET-50, MobileNetV2, and SocialdistancingNet-19. In particular, the integration of the YoloV4 and SENET attention layer as part of a FL framework delivers dependable performance while addressing facemask detection (94.6%), incorrect facemask detection (98%), facemask classification (95.4%), social distance (96.1%), contact tracing (95.2%) and cyber attack detection (94.2%) while performing tasks like correct and incorrect, proper and improper facemask wearing, monitoring social distancing norms observance, and contact tracing.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFederated LearningPandemicsArtificial IntelligenceContact TracingDeep LearningHumansInternet of ThingsContact tracingCyber-attackDeep learningDeep transfer learningEdge computingFacemaskFederated learningSocial distancing

Identifiers

PMID40593962
PMCPMC12216392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.