ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable semi-supervised model for predicting invasion depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on the IPCL and AVA patterns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluation of invasion depth is essential for the treatment strategy of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the application of the Japanese Endoscopic Society classification system, based on the patterns of intravascular papillary cell layer (IPCL) and avascular area (AVA), requires a long-term training for endoscopists. We aimed to develop explainable semi-supervised models for predicting ESCC invasion depth based on the IPCL/AVA patterns. A total of 2,643 images of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging in the upstream task, self-supervised contrastive learning (n = 2,175), and the downstream task, fine-tuning (n = 468), were from Suzhou. In the fine-tuning, two approaches were adopted: the traditional blackbox or the explainable AI. Lastly, the models were evaluated in an external test dataset (Jintan, n = 60), in comparison with two endoscopists. The primary outcome was 3-way classification of ESCC invasion depth. The metrics included accuracy, Matthew correlation coefficient, and Cohen's kappa. Furthermore, Grad-CAM was for visualized explanation of images; local interpretation, feature importance, and partial dependence plots were conducted for classifiers; and t-SNE was for visualization of feature vectors. A Xception-backboned explainable model (accuracy 0.817) had exhibited better performance than other models and a junior endoscopist (0.733), even though it underperformed a senior (0.883) by 0.066 on accuracy. However, the endoscopists' performance was improved by AI assistance (junior 0.833 and senior 0.917). The explainable semi-supervised framework empowers AI models to achieve improved transparentness and performance, facing the opacity of traditional supervised learning and limited amounts of labelled endoscopic images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.