ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the synergistic effects of metformin and doxorubicin loaded chitosan nanoparticles for A549 lung cancer therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chitosan-based nanoparticles as a targeted drug delivery system to treat thyroid cancer: A literature review.Medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison of Metformin Combinations with Other Repurposed Drugs in the Treatment of Hamster Fibrosarcoma: A Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Baicalin: A comprehensive review of its molecular mechanisms and pharmacological activities.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Metformin-Loaded Fusogenic Liposome Improves the Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Doxorubicin in a Breast Cancer Treatment.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Advancing cancer radiotherapy: Harnessing radiosensitizers and nanotechnology for enhanced tumor control.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years the efforts for devising effective methods to confront cancer have grasped significant attention. Since conventional methods have failed to fulfill the favorable therapeutic outcome, efforts have been made to develop novel methods. Currently, incorporating drugs in nanocarriers are considered as an effective method. Herein, we prepared chitosan nanoparticles (Cs NPs) loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) and metformin (Met) and evaluated their physicochemical and anticancer in vitro properties. The drug loaded Cs NPs were prepared using the ionic gelation method. The size and surface charge of the Cs NPs were evaluated with DLS. Further characterization was made with SEM imaging. Drug loading was confirmed with FTIR analysis and assessed with calculating the UV absorbance of the unloaded drug. Cs NPs stability was also examined with DLS and XRD results. Drug release was investigated ultimately using semi-permeable membrane. Initially, the biosafety of the blank Cs NPs was assessed on A549 and NIH-3 cells with MTT assay. Flowcytometry was used to test the NPs uptake by A549 cells. Similarly, the cytotoxic effect of Met and DOX Cs NPs was explored. The results were analyzed with CompuSyn software and the highest synergistic dose combination (Fa50) was obtained. Using Fa50 concentrations, apoptosis, scratch, 3D cultures, anti-angiogenesis, and western blot assays were performed. The size of DOX-Cs NPs and Met-Cs NPs were 51.20 nm and 48.20 nm, and zeta potentials were 23.26 mV and 25.05 mV, respectively. The EE were 59.03% for DOX and 86.39% for Met. Drug release investigation demonstrated a pH-independent release for DOX, achieving 80% release, while Met exhibited a pH-dependent release, with 70% release. Synergistic CI value of 0.91 was achieved in the toxicity assay and nanoparticulation lowered the IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.