Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595395›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2025

Consensus artificial intelligence-driven prognostic signature for predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center and large-scale study.

Wen Wen, Rui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wen WenCardiovascular Medicine, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, 570208, China.
Rui WangHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya Medical College, Central South University, Haikou, 570208, China. wangr1995@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6032-4478

Funding

Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 823MS169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a leading cause of global cancer mortality, requires molecular stratification to advance precision oncology. This study developed a consensus artificial intelligence-derived prognostic signature (CAIPS) by integrating ten machine learning algorithms (101 methods) across six multi-center HCC cohorts (n = 1110). The optimized seven-gene CAIPS, constructed using StepCox[both] and GBM, demonstrated superior prognostic accuracy over traditional clinical parameters and 150 published signatures. Multi-omics profiling linked high CAIPS scores to metabolic pathway dysregulation and genomic instability, whereas low CAIPS scores predicted enhanced therapeutic responsiveness to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. Screening of CTPR, PRISM, and Connectivity Map databases prioritized Irinotecan and BI-2536 as candidate therapeutics for high-CAIPS patients. Functional validation revealed that PITX1 knockdown significantly suppressed HCC cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and xenograft tumor growth, mechanistically attributed to Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibition. In vitro experiments revealed that Irinotecan and BI-2536 exhibit high potential as anti-HCC drugs. Collectively, CAIPS serves as a robust multi-dimensional biomarker system for risk stratification, therapy optimization, and personalized HCC management. The concurrent identification of Irinotecan and BI-2536 as targeted agents and PITX1-mediated pathway regulation establishes actionable frameworks for precision oncology.

Identifiers

PMID40595395
PMCPMC12216013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.