ArticleNature communications2025
An ex vivo uterine system captures implantation, embryogenesis, and trophoblast invasion via maternal-embryonic signaling.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Embryonic Mediators of Embryo-Uterus Communication, Implantation and Pregnancy.Molecular reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Developmental Morphokinetics and the Transcriptomic Profile of Bovine First-Cleaved Embryos: Normal vs. Abnormal Divisions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Back to the Future-A 50-Year Dive into Embryo Implantation Research: Cell Biological Paradox, Epithelial Cell Polarity, and EMT.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- The challenges and prospects of mammalian reproduction in extraterrestrial environments.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Review
- Engineering human endometrial model systems in reproductive health and disease.npj biomedical innovations · 2025Review
- Unlocking the Secrets of the Endometrium: Stem Cells, Niches and Modern Methodologies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Toward Implantation-Assisting Technologies: Lessons From In Vivo and Ex Vivo Models.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embryo implantation remains challenging to study because of its inaccessibility in situ despite its essentiality and clinical significance. Although recent studies on long-term culture of authentic and model embryos have provided significant advances in elucidating embryogenesis in vitro, they, without the uterus, cannot genuinely replicate implantation. Here, we have recapitulated bona fide implantation ex vivo at more than 90% efficiency followed by embryogenesis and trophoblast invasion using authentic mouse embryos and uterine tissue. We utilized air-liquid interface culture method with originally developed devices manufactured with polydimethylsiloxane. Notably, the system replicated the robust induction of a maternal implantation regulator COX-2 at the attachment interface, which was accompanied by trophoblastic AKT activation, suggesting a possible signaling that mediates maternal COX-2 and embryonic AKT1 that accelerates implantation. By expanding the ex vivo findings, embryonic AKT1 transduction ameliorated defective implantation of uterine origin by a COX-2 inhibitor in vivo. The system, proposing a potentially standard platform of embryogenesis, offers a concise, reproducible, and scalable screening system, suggesting significant implications for developmental biology and therapeutic strategies for recurrent implantation failure in assisted reproductive technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.