ArticleNature communications2025
In-silico 3D molecular editing through physics-informed and preference-aligned generative foundation models.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In-silico 3D molecular editing through physics-informed and preference-aligned generative foundation models.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generating molecular structures towards desired properties is a critical task in computer-aided drug and material design. As special 3D entities, molecules inherit non-trivial physical complexity, and many intrinsic properties may not be learnable through pure data-driven approaches, hindering the transaction of powerful generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to this field. To avoid existing molecular GenAI's heavy reliance on domain-specific models and priors, in this research, we derive theoretical guidelines to bridge the methodological gap between GenAI for images and molecules, allowing pre-training of foundation models for 3D molecular generation. Difficulties due to symmetry, stability and entropy, which are critical for molecules, are overcome through a simple and model-agnostic training protocol. Moreover, we apply physics-informed strategies to force MolEdit, a pre-trained multimodal molecular GenAI, to obey physics laws and align with contextual preferences, and thus suppress undesired model hallucinations. MolEdit can generate valid molecules with comprehensive symmetry, strikes a better balance between configuration stability and conformer diversity, and supports complicated 3D scaffolds which frustrate other methods. Furthermore, MolEdit is applicable for zero-shot lead optimization and linker design following contextual and geometrical specifications. Collectively, as a foundation model, MolEdit offers flexibility and developability for AI-aided editing and manipulation of molecules serving various purposes.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.