Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40595685›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Cellular and biophysical barriers to lipid nanoparticle mediated delivery of RNA to the cytosol.

Johanna M Johansson, Hampus Du Rietz, Hampus Hedlund, Hanna C Eriksson, Erik Oude Blenke, Aditya Pote, Said Harun, Pontus Nordenfelt, Lennart Lindfors, Anders Wittrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Biologic Therapies for Alleviating Neurodegeneration in Lysosomal Storage Diseases.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johanna M Johansson *Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section for Oncology, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5090-9701
Hampus Du Rietz *Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section for Oncology, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5530-3821
Hampus Hedlund *Lund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section for Oncology, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3168-7920
Hanna C ErikssonLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section for Oncology, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-7177
Erik Oude BlenkeAdvanced Drug Delivery, Pharmaceutical Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0628-3350
Aditya PoteAdvanced Drug Delivery, Pharmaceutical Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8703-5190
Said HarunAdvanced Drug Delivery, Pharmaceutical Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0854-0442
Pontus NordenfeltLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section for Infectious Medicine, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9481-9951
Lennart LindforsAdvanced Drug Delivery, Pharmaceutical Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anders WittrupLund University, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Section for Oncology, Lund, Sweden. anders.wittrup@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4918-0500

Funding

Fru Berta Kamprads Stiftelse (Mrs. Berta Kamprad Foundation) FBKS-2020-33-308Fru Berta Kamprads Stiftelse (Mrs. Berta Kamprad Foundation) FBKS-2022-40-422Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation) WCMM2019Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2020-02647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are clinically approved for mRNA-based vaccines and liver-targeted siRNA delivery. However, poor nucleic acid delivery efficiency limits their application in extrahepatic tissues and tumors. Here, using live-cell and super-resolution microscopy, we identify multiple distinct steps of inefficiencies in the cytosolic delivery of both siRNA and mRNA cargoes. Membrane damages marked by galectin recruitment are conducive to cytosolic RNA release, whereas membrane perturbations recruiting the ESCRT machinery do not permit endosomal escape. Notably, only a small fraction of RNA is released from galectin-marked endosomes and, unexpectedly, many damaged endosomes contain no detectable RNA cargo. Using LNPs with both fluorescently labeled ionizable lipid and RNA, we show that these components segregate during endosomal sorting - both within single endosomes and across endosomal compartments. Finally, we visualize localized ionizable lipid enrichment in endosomal membranes and membrane damage in direct proximity to siRNA-LNPs tethered to luminal vesicle membranes. Taken together, our findings reveal multiple mechanistic barriers limiting intracellular RNA delivery by LNPs.

Indexed as

CytosolLipidsNanoparticlesRNA, Small InterferingEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportEndosomesHeLa CellsHumansLiposomesRNA, MessengerEndosomal Sorting Complexes Required for TransportLipid NanoparticlesLipidsLiposomesRNA, MessengerRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID40595685
PMCPMC12217163

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.