ArticleScientific reports2025
Fluoxetine and agomelatine mitigate anhedonic and hepatic changes in chronic restraint stress rat model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuroprotective effects of agomelatine in a D-galactose-induced hippocampal aging model.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic stress, a common condition in modern life, is increasingly connected to a variety of medical concerns, including liver damage. Despite being one of the body's most resilient organs, the liver is yet susceptible to the harmful effects of chronic stress. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects of fluoxetine and agomelatine on the liver after exposure to the chronic restraint stress (CRS) model in rats. Thirty-six male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into four groups: control, CRS + vehicle, CRS + fluoxetine, and CRS + agomelatine. Except for controls, all rats underwent CRS (2.5 h/day) for five weeks. During the last three weeks, groups received daily oral vehicle, fluoxetine, or agomelatine. Behavioral tests, forced swim test (FST) and sucrose preference test (SPT), were performed in the final week. Blood and liver samples were collected for biochemical and immunohistochemical analyses for liver enzymes, hepatic oxidative stress, and apoptotic and proliferative markers. The use of agomelatine for three consecutive weeks in CRS rats reversed immobility and climbing and slightly improved sucrose preference. No significant changes were detected in plasma liver transaminases compared to the control or treated groups. Nonetheless, agomelatine treatment significantly attenuated the oxidative stress induced by CRS, particularly in malondialdehyde (MDA) level (*P ≤ 0.05). The histological examination of liver tissues revealed fluoxetine and agomelatine mitigated CRS-induced cellular infiltration and nuclear hyperchromasia. Additionally, both drugs significantly reduced the upregulation of caspase-3 (***P ≤ 0.001) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, ***P ≤ 0.001) in CRS rats. This study revealed for the first time the potential therapeutic role of fluoxetine and agomelatine on the liver during the CRS depression model by controlling oxidative stress and hepatic regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.