ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive value of asprosin combined with LAP for metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease in the physical examination population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To combine two indicators, asprosin and lipid accumulation product (LAP), to assess their predictive value for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and to provide a more convenient and accurate option for mass screening of the MASLD population. Data were collected from 1249 adult subjects who underwent physical examination, LAP was calculated and serum asprosin was measured. Statistical analyses were performed and ROC curves were constructed to assess the predictive value of asprosin, LAP and their combination for MASLD. Asprosin and LAP levels were significantly higher in the MASLD group than in the non-MASLD group (P < 0.001), and asprosin and LAP were independent risk factors for the development of MASLD (P < 0.05).The combination of asprosin and LAP had the highest predictive efficacy for MASLD, and the AUCs were 0.841, 0.821 and 0.871 in the total, male and female populations, respectively. Asprosin and LAP are both good predictors of MASLD, and their combined performance is better than either indicator alone, and better in women than in men.The combination of asprosin and LAP may be an ideal marker for MASLD screening and individualised monitoring and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.