ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a machine learning model to identify the predictors of the neonatal intensive care unit admission.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The risk of late-onset fetal growth restriction and unfavorable neonatal outcomes among fetuses within the 10th-25th weight percentile: a prospective cohort study.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Article
- Development and interpretability of a machine learning model for postoperative hypothermia prediction in placenta previa Cesarean section: A retrospective cohort study.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Fetal Macrosomia Using Maternal: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and external validation of machine learning models to predict insulin resistance among iron-deficient children and adolescents.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- A Predictive Model for Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery in Multiparous Women After Active Labor Onset.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- The power of machine learning models in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Optimized ensemble learning framework for neonatal asphyxia prediction using perinatal clinical features.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Prediction of Neonatal Length of Stay in High-Risk Pregnancies Using Regression-Based Machine Learning on Computerized Cardiotocography Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Developing a prognostic model for predicting preterm birth using a machine learning algorithm.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-based machine learning models for assisting the prediction of neonatal size and mode of delivery.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scientists aim to create a system that can predict the likelihood of newborns being admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by combining various statistical methods. This prediction could potentially reduce the negative health outcomes, deaths, and medical costs associated with NICU stays by detecting potential cases early on. This study utilized a retrospective cohort design. The primary outcome of the research focused on admissions to the NICU. The real-time data of pregnant women with a cephalic presentation who gave birth between January 2020 and December 2022 were extracted from the electronic health records of Khaleej-e-Fars Hospital in Bandar Abbas, Iran. The first step of the analysis involved comparing healthy babies to those admitted to the NICU. Variables that had a significant p-value (less than 0.05) were selected as features for the machine learning approach. The input data were utilized to train nine different machine learning models. In our assessment, we used the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1- score to evaluate the effectiveness. During the study period, the rate of NICU admission at our center was 477 out of 3,062 deliveries (15.5%). In comparison to other models, the random forest classification had the highest accuracy (0.87) and AUC (0.87) for predicting NICU admission. According to our findings, the most significant predictors of NICU admission among several maternal and clinical factors were gestational age, maternal age, parity, a history of neonatal death, onset of labor, multiple pregnancy, fetal distress, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, method of childbirth, neonatal weight, and sex. We have identified several important factors that increase the likelihood of newborns being admitted to the NICU, which could assist in predicting the need for additional neonatal care during delivery and in advising women on the chances of NICU admission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.