ArticleScientific reports2025
Linking basic principles of solution chemistry to kidney stone formation timelines.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Kidney stone formation remains enigmatic, largely because of its multifactorial nature, and because assessment is by necessity based mostly on a posteriori analysis and/or on specific analyses (e.g., prescribed components found in urine) that focus on particular conditions. Here, we offer a different perspective to assess overall aspects of stone formation, delineating a method to calculate minimum times of stone formation as a function of stone type (calcium oxalate, calcium phosphate, and uric acid) and size (up to 10 mm), in the form of the pure mass of the stone, without consideration of actual formation or aggregation causes or processes. The calculations thus represent characteristic measures that delineate limits on times required to form specific stone volumes as a function of chemical content and mass. The times to form each stone type and specific size vary considerably, ranging from days to years. A key factor is the amount of the "building block" material in urine that actually contributes to stone formation, i.e., the % yield from solution to solid phase. In some cases, unrealistically high yields (e.g., 5-10%) are required to form a stone with a specified size, type, and time; this indicates that other factors - at least some of which can be deduced from the analysis - play key roles in stone formation. This information thus provides estimates that constrain assessments of stone formation mechanisms and interpretation of clinical findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.