ArticleScientific reports2025
An interval type-2 fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for patient bed allocation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective inpatient bed management is critical for optimizing healthcare resource utilization and ensuring high-quality patient care. The growing imbalance between bed capacity and patient demand underscores the need for robust, patient-centered prioritization frameworks. However, existing approaches often neglect patient-specific characteristics, interdependencies among criteria, and uncertainty inherent in decision-making processes. To address these challenges, this study proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework that integrates interval type-2 fuzzy sets, the DEMATEL method, and the VIKOR method. Interval type-2 fuzzy sets are used to manage linguistic uncertainty; DEMATEL identifies causal relationships among evaluation criteria; and the 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method enables comprehensive ranking of patient admission alternatives by balancing clinical urgency, operational efficiency, and fairness. Empirical analysis demonstrates that medical urgency, diagnosis type priority and wait time are the most influential criteria, emphasizing their critical role in patient prioritization. The proposed framework effectively models interdependencies and provides transparent, structured rankings, offering a robust tool for equitable and efficient resource allocation in capacity-constrained healthcare settings. This study contributes to healthcare operations research by delivering a flexible and interpretable method for improving patient admission decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.