Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2025
Efficacy and safety of esketamine hydrochloride injection at different dosages for patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer: a randomized trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to the combination of remimazolam toluene sulfonate and esketamine hydrochloride in reducing postoperative complications and improving recovery outcomes in thyroid surgery patients.
methodsOne hundred twenty patients undergoing radical thyroidectomy were randomly assigned to four groups: control group (Group C) and three esketamine groups (Groups S1, S2, S3). Before peeling, groups S1, S2, and S3 were administered with 0.15, 0.25, and 0.35 mg/kg of esketamine via slow intravenous injection, respectively. The primary outcomes was recovery quality (QoR-15). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain (NRS scores), incidence of coughing (Minogue score), hemodynamic stability, emotional recovery (HADS scores), extubation time, adverse reactions, and sufentanil consumption.
resultsBaseline data showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Pain and HADS scores were significantly lower in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05). QoR-15 scores were significantly higher in all esketamine groups (p < 0.05). Postoperative recovery and extubation times were longer in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05), with Group S3 having the longest. Postoperative cough severity and incidence were significantly lower in Groups S2 and S3 (p < 0.05). HR and SBP increased at t1 in Groups S2 and S3 but normalized by t4, with less pronounced changes in Group S2. No significant differences in adverse reactions (p > 0.05).
conclusionEsketamine at doses of 0.25 mg/kg/h and 0.35 mg/kg/h improves recovery, reduces pain and coughing, and maintains hemodynamic stability. A dose of 0.25 mg/kg/h offers optimal clinical benefits with faster recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.