Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40596950›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Radiomics and machine learning for osteoporosis detection using abdominal computed tomography: a retrospective multicenter study.

Zhai Liu, Yongjun Li, Chenguang Zhang, Hui Xu, Junlu Zhao, Chencui Huang, Xingzhi Chen, Qingyun Ren

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Local fragility index and Radiomics-lite modeling of CT-Derived Hounsfield units for osteoporosis risk assessment in spine surgery patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Osteoporosis prediction using lumbar CT Hounsfield units: comparative performance and clinical implications of seven machine learning models.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhai LiuDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050031, China.
Yongjun LiDepartment of Medical Imaging, The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, 056001, China.
Chenguang ZhangDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050031, China.
Hui XuDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050031, China.
Junlu ZhaoDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050031, China.
Chencui HuangDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of, PHD Technology Co.Ltd, Beijing, 100080, China.
Xingzhi ChenDepartment of Research Collaboration, R&D Center, Beijing Deepwise & League of, PHD Technology Co.Ltd, Beijing, 100080, China.
Qingyun RenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050031, China. Ren_qingyun@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model to detect osteoporosis using radiomic features and machine learning (ML) approaches from lumbar spine computed tomography (CT) images during an abdominal CT examination.

methodsA total of 509 patients who underwent both quantitative CT (QCT) and abdominal CT examinations (training group, n = 279; internal validation group, n = 120; external validation group, n = 110) were analyzed in this retrospective study from two centers. Radiomic features were extracted from the lumbar spine CT images. Seven radiomic-based ML models, including logistic regression (LR), Bernoulli, Gaussian NB, SGD, decision tree, support vector machine (SVM), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) models, were constructed. The performance of the models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsThe radiomic model based on LR in the internal validation group and external validation group had excellent performance, with an AUC of 0.960 and 0.786 for differentiating osteoporosis from normal BMD and osteopenia, respectively. The radiomic model based on LR in the internal validation group and Gaussian NB model in the external validation group yielded the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.905 and 0.839 for discriminating normal BMD from osteopenia and osteoporosis, respectively. DCA in the internal validation group revealed that the LR model had greater net benefit than the other models in differentiating osteoporosis from normal BMD and osteopenia.

conclusionRadiomic-based ML approaches may be used to predict osteoporosis from abdominal CT images and as a tool for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOsteoporosisRadiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSupport Vector MachineComputed tomographyMachine learningOsteoporosisRadiomicsVertebral body

Identifiers

PMID40596950
PMCPMC12219684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.