ArticleBMC nursing2025
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on factors influencing provision of chronic care self-management support by nurses: an exploratory qualitative study from the South Asian context.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A post-discharge homecare journey map for patients with colorectal cancer living with a permanent stoma: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- A nursing process for self-management support in home healthcare: A qualitative study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses play a critical role in supporting the self-management of patients with chronic illnesses. However, there is a lack of evidence on this important topic from the South Asian context. This study aimed to understand what influences nurses' role in the provision of self-management support in chronic care within the South Asian context.
methodsAn exploratory, descriptive qualitative study was conducted at two private university hospitals and one public university hospital in Pakistan. Purposive sampling was employed. Fifty-four healthcare professionals, with at least one year of experience in chronic non-communicable disease care, participated. Data were collected using a self-developed semi-structured interview guide. Seven focus groups (with nurses and nursing faculty) and 16 individual interviews (with nurse managers and physicians) were conducted. Thematic analysis was done. We adhered to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ) for reporting the current study.
resultsNurses' supportive role in chronic illness self-management appears to be influenced by interdependent external and internal factors. Their motivation to perform supportive roles seems fragile and heavily dependent on external factors. Amongst the other factors, due to the institutions' narrow perspective on self-management support, nurses face a mismatch between their expected and documented roles. Moreover, trust in positioning nurses in a supportive role seems superficial and situation-driven.
conclusionsThe factors influencing nurses' supportive role in self-management reflected a unique perspective from the South Asian context. The study suggests implementing measures that can be undertaken at the nurses and healthcare system levels, to strengthen nurses' role in the provision of self-management support in chronic care, in the South Asian context. It also emphasizes the need for training interventions to increase nurses' motivation and self-efficacy, and to reduce their reliance on external factors affecting on their role performance. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.