ArticleBMC nursing2025
Predictive power of the HEMPA risk assessment method for musculoskeletal disorders in nurses and caregivers: insights and implications.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionWork-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) pose a critical occupational health challenge for nurses and caregivers, with high prevalence rates impacting workforce sustainability and care quality. This study evaluates the predictive power of the HEMPA (Herramienta de Evaluación de Movilización de Pacientes) risk assessment method for WMSDs in these high-risk populations, addressing the urgent need for validated tools to guide ergonomic interventions.
methodsThis descriptive and analytical study involved 90 caregivers and nurses from various wards of a medical center in 2024. Data were collected through a three-part form supervised by researchers (demographics, body map musculoskeletal questionnaire, HEMPA tool). Logistic regression assessed HEMPA's predictive capacity for WMSDs prevalence and its relationship with variables like age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and job characteristics. The predictive power of the HEMPA method for different body parts was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve values. The study data were analyzed using Stata v.14 software, with a significance level of less than 5% for all tests (P < 0.05).
resultIn this study, 90 caregivers and nurses participated with an age range of 24-60 years and BMI of 27.15 ± 4.02 kg/m
conclusionHEMPA effectively identifies WMSD risks, particularly in high-burden areas like the lower back and neck. This validation underscores HEMPA's utility as a preventive tool, aligning with global efforts to reduce ergonomic hazards for caregivers and nurses. Furthermore, integrating HEMPA with digital monitoring platforms such as injury reporting software and wearable sensors for real-time risk assessment is proposed as a practical solution. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.