Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40598036›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Comparison of somatic mutations and clinicopathologic features of micropapillary and non-micropapillary colorectal carcinomas.

Zeynep Sagnak Yilmaz, Sibel Demir Kececi, Sevdegul Aydin Mungan, Ismail Saygin, Sulen Sarioglu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zeynep Sagnak YilmazDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Izmir, 35330, Turkey. zeynep.sagnak@ktu.edu.tr.
Sibel Demir KececiDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Izmir, 35330, Turkey.
Sevdegul Aydin MunganDepartment of Pathology, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey.
Ismail SayginDepartment of Pathology, Karadeniz Technical University Faculty of Medicine, Trabzon, Turkey.
Sulen SariogluDepartment of Molecular Pathology, Dokuz Eylul University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Izmir, 35330, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicropapillary carcinoma (MPC) is a type of tumor that is histopathologically characterized by the presence of small papillary structures. Literature data on somatic mutations in MPCs are very limited.

methodsOne hundred fifty-nine colon resection cases diagnosed with adenocarcinoma whose DNA mutations were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) were retrospectively reviewed. In 10 cases, the MPC area exceeded 5%. Chi-square test was used to evaluate histopathologic characteristics and somatic mutations in MPCs and non-MPCs. The relationship between mutations and clinicopathological parameters in all cases was investigated.

resultsThe presence of MPC areas in carcinomas was associated with higher histologic grades (MPC: n = 6; 60% vs. non-MPC: n = 22; 14.8%), more advanced pathologic T (pT4 MPC: n = 5; 50% vs. non-MPC: n = 46; 34.6%) and N stages (pN2b MPC: n = 5; 50% vs. non-MPC: n = 26; 19.5%) and more frequent tumor deposits (MPC: n = 7; 87.5% vs. non-MPC: n = 44; 46.8%), lymphovascular invasion (MPC: n = 8; 80% vs. non-MPC: n = 83; 55.7%), and perineural invasion (MPC: n = 7; 70% vs. non-MPC: n = 42; 28.2%). A significant difference was found between MPCs and non-MPCs in terms of histological grade (p = 0.002) and perineural invasion (p = 0.01). TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA genes were the most frequently mutated genes in both MPCs and non-MPCs (TP53 MPC: n = 6; 100% vs. non-MPC: n = 72; 64.9% - KRAS MPC: n = 4; 40% vs. non-MPC: n = 66; 44.3% - PIK3CA MPC: n = 2; 20% vs. non-MPC: n = 32; 21.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in somatic mutations between the groups (TP53: p = 0.177, KRAS: p = 1.000, PIK3CA: p = 1.000, BRCA2: p = 0.181, ERBB2: p = 0.327, BRAF: p = 1.000, MAP2K1: p = 0.062). A significant difference was found between the TP53 mutant and TP53 wild-type groups in terms of tumor deposits (p = 0.033) and perineural invasion (p = 0.046). The male rate was significantly higher in KRAS wild-type cases (n = 69; 77.5%) compared to KRAS mutant cases (n = 38; 54.3%) (p = 0.002). The mean age, T and N staging were significantly different between PIK3CA mutant and PIK3CA wild-type cases (p = 0.01; p = 0.033; p = 0.019, respectively).

conclusionsWe found that MPCs had more advanced clinical stages and histological features associated with poor prognosis, such as advanced T and N stages, higher histological grade, presence of tumor deposits, lymphovascular and perineural invasion.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, PapillaryColorectal NeoplasmsMutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanClinicopathological featuresColorectal carcinomaMicropapillary carcinomaNext-generation sequencingSomatic mutation

Identifiers

PMID40598036
PMCPMC12211183

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.