ArticleBMC cancer2025
Comparison of somatic mutations and clinicopathologic features of micropapillary and non-micropapillary colorectal carcinomas.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicropapillary carcinoma (MPC) is a type of tumor that is histopathologically characterized by the presence of small papillary structures. Literature data on somatic mutations in MPCs are very limited.
methodsOne hundred fifty-nine colon resection cases diagnosed with adenocarcinoma whose DNA mutations were analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) were retrospectively reviewed. In 10 cases, the MPC area exceeded 5%. Chi-square test was used to evaluate histopathologic characteristics and somatic mutations in MPCs and non-MPCs. The relationship between mutations and clinicopathological parameters in all cases was investigated.
resultsThe presence of MPC areas in carcinomas was associated with higher histologic grades (MPC: n = 6; 60% vs. non-MPC: n = 22; 14.8%), more advanced pathologic T (pT4 MPC: n = 5; 50% vs. non-MPC: n = 46; 34.6%) and N stages (pN2b MPC: n = 5; 50% vs. non-MPC: n = 26; 19.5%) and more frequent tumor deposits (MPC: n = 7; 87.5% vs. non-MPC: n = 44; 46.8%), lymphovascular invasion (MPC: n = 8; 80% vs. non-MPC: n = 83; 55.7%), and perineural invasion (MPC: n = 7; 70% vs. non-MPC: n = 42; 28.2%). A significant difference was found between MPCs and non-MPCs in terms of histological grade (p = 0.002) and perineural invasion (p = 0.01). TP53, KRAS, and PIK3CA genes were the most frequently mutated genes in both MPCs and non-MPCs (TP53 MPC: n = 6; 100% vs. non-MPC: n = 72; 64.9% - KRAS MPC: n = 4; 40% vs. non-MPC: n = 66; 44.3% - PIK3CA MPC: n = 2; 20% vs. non-MPC: n = 32; 21.5%). There was no statistically significant difference in somatic mutations between the groups (TP53: p = 0.177, KRAS: p = 1.000, PIK3CA: p = 1.000, BRCA2: p = 0.181, ERBB2: p = 0.327, BRAF: p = 1.000, MAP2K1: p = 0.062). A significant difference was found between the TP53 mutant and TP53 wild-type groups in terms of tumor deposits (p = 0.033) and perineural invasion (p = 0.046). The male rate was significantly higher in KRAS wild-type cases (n = 69; 77.5%) compared to KRAS mutant cases (n = 38; 54.3%) (p = 0.002). The mean age, T and N staging were significantly different between PIK3CA mutant and PIK3CA wild-type cases (p = 0.01; p = 0.033; p = 0.019, respectively).
conclusionsWe found that MPCs had more advanced clinical stages and histological features associated with poor prognosis, such as advanced T and N stages, higher histological grade, presence of tumor deposits, lymphovascular and perineural invasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.