ArticleBMC biology2025
The genome of a sea spider corroborates a shared Hox cluster motif in arthropods with a reduced posterior tagma.
Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conserved and diverged embryonic expression patterns of panarthropod NK-Cluster genes and new evidence for CRE-shuffling.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Big Spider, Big Genome: Chromosome-Level Genome of a North American Tarantula (Aphonopelma marxi) and Comparative Genomics Across 300 Million Years of Spider Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Developmental system drift in the patterning of the arthropod tarsus.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
- Gene and Genome Duplication in Spiders.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025Review
- The genome of a sea spider corroborates a shared Hox cluster motif in arthropods with a reduced posterior tagma.BMC biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChelicerate evolution is contentiously debated, with recent studies challenging traditional phylogenetic hypotheses and scenarios of major evolutionary events, like terrestrialization. Sea spiders (Pycnogonida) represent the uncontested marine sister group of all other chelicerates, featuring a-likely plesiomorphic-indirect development. Accordingly, pycnogonids hold the potential to provide crucial insight into the evolution of chelicerate genomes and body patterning. Due to the lack of high-quality genomic and transcriptomic resources, however, this potential remains largely unexplored.
resultsWe employ long-read sequencing and proximity ligation data to assemble the first near chromosome-level sea spider genome for Pycnogonum litorale, complemented by comprehensive transcriptomic resources. The assembly has a size of 471 Mb in 57 pseudochromosomes, a repeat content of 61.05%, 15,372 predicted protein-coding genes, and robust completeness scores (95.8% BUSCO Arthropoda score, 95.7% of conserved microRNA families). Genome-scale self-synteny and homeobox gene cluster analysis show no evidence of a whole-genome duplication (WGD). We identify a single, intact Hox cluster lacking Abdominal-A (abdA/Hox9), corroborated by the absence of an abdA ortholog in the novel transcriptomic resources.
conclusionsOur high-quality genomic and transcriptomic resources establish P. litorale as a key research organism for modern studies on chelicerate genome evolution, development, and phylogeny. The lack of WGD signature in P. litorale further strengthens the inference that WGDs are derived traits in the chelicerate tree. The combination of abdA loss with the reduction of the posterior tagma emerges as a common theme in arthropod evolution, as it is shared with other, distantly related arthropod taxa with a vestigial opisthosoma/abdomen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.