ArticleNeurological research and practice2025
Atrophy related neuroimaging biomarkers for neurological and cognitive function in Wilson disease.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotype-specific white matter microstructural alterations and their clinical correlates in Wilson disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Brain-body interactions in systemic diseases: a survey from an imaging perspective.MedScience · 2026Review
- The gut-liver-kidney-brain axis in Wilson disease: copper speciation-flux and barrier-mediated organ crosstalk.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough brain atrophy is a prevalent finding in Wilson disease (WD), its role as a contributing factor to clinical symptoms, especially cognitive decline, remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate different neuroimaging biomarkers related to grey matter atrophy and their relationship with neurological and cognitive impairment in WD.
methodsIn this study, 30 WD patients and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled prospectively and underwent structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Regional atrophy was evaluated using established linear radiological measurements and the automated workflow volumetric estimation of gross atrophy and brain age longitudinally (veganbagel) for age- and sex-specific estimations of regional brain volume changes. Brain Age Gap Estimate (BrainAGE), defined as the discrepancy between machine learning predicted brain age from structural MRI and chronological age, was assessed using an established model. Atrophy markers and clinical scores were compared between 19 WD patients with a neurological phenotype (neuro-WD), 11 WD patients with a hepatic phenotype (hep-WD), and a healthy control group using Welch's ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test. Correlations between atrophy markers and neurological and neuropsychological scores were investigated using Spearman's correlation coefficients.
resultsPatients with neuro-WD demonstrated increased third ventricle width and bicaudate index, along with significant striatal-thalamic atrophy patterns that correlated with global cognitive function, mental processing speed, and verbal memory. Median BrainAGE was significantly higher in patients with neuro-WD (8.97 years, interquartile range [IQR] = 5.62-15.73) compared to those with hep-WD (4.72 years, IQR = 0.00-5.48) and healthy controls (0.46 years, IQR = - 4.11-4.24). Striatal-thalamic atrophy and BrainAGE were significantly correlated with neurological symptom severity.
conclusionsOur findings indicate advanced predicted brain age and substantial striatal-thalamic atrophy patterns in patients with neuro-WD, which serve as promising neuroimaging biomarkers for neurological and cognitive functions in treated, chronic WD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.