Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40599661›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2025

Increased access to pediatric specialist healthcare using eConsult: A retrospective observational cohort and case-control study.

Lillian Lai, Sophia Roubos, Dhenuka Radhakrishnan, Eric I Benchimol, Xuesong Wang, Lavina Matai, Erin Keely, Clare Liddy, Kimmo Murto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lillian LaiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sophia RoubosCHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Dhenuka RadhakrishnanDivision of Respirology, Department of Pediatrics, CHEO, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Eric I BenchimolDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, SickKids Inflammatory Bowel Disease Centre, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Xuesong WangICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lavina MataiICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erin KeelyDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Clare LiddyDepartment of Family Medicine, C.T. Lamont Primary Healthcare Research Centre, Bruyere Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kimmo MurtoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, CHEO, CHEO Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Primary care practitioners (PCPs) report that using the Champlain BASE™ eConsult service (eConsult) averts one-third of face-to-face (FTF) specialist referrals, however, there are concerns about duplication of services and adverse patient outcomes. Following an eConsult, we evaluated patient healthcare utilization and associated treatment costs. Methods: Retrospective cohort study (2014 to 2018) of patients (<18 years old) for whom an eConsult visit averted a FTF specialist referral. Patients were linked to provincial health administrative databases and hospital electronic medical records for healthcare use for the same diagnosis and specialty for the 18 months following the eConsult. Concurrently, a retrospective case-control study compared utilization and costs between an eConsult versus a matched FTF visit for the same diagnosis. We also assessed PCP satisfaction. Results: In follow-up, <5% of the study cohort of eConsult patients (n = 242) later accessed the healthcare system for the identical diagnosis and specialty type. FTF visits generate more frequent outpatient visits (12.6 times more [95% CI: 2.28 to 69.66, P = 0.002]) and higher costs compared to eConsult visits. There were no hospital admissions or deaths in patients with eConsult. PCPs (98%) described eConsult as an excellent service. Conclusions: Using eConsult is associated with <5% of patients subsequently having a FTF visit for the same reason. Matched FTF visits generated more healthcare utilization and higher costs compared with eConsult. eConsult in pediatrics is safe and can minimize FTF specialist visits in elective cases and increase capacity, towards a more efficient and cost-effective healthcare system.

Indexed as

CostseConsultFace-to-facePatientsPrimary care practitionersVisit

Identifiers

PMID40599661
PMCPMC12208371

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.