ReviewMolecular and clinical oncology2025
Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for breast cancer-related secondary lymphedema (Review).
Review in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive overview of management and risk assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a multidisciplinary approach.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secondary lymphedema, affecting ~15-30% of patients who survive breast cancer, is a common consequence following treatment. At present, there is no gold standard for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Conventional methods such as physiotherapy and surgery demonstrate a limited effectiveness in mitigating lymphatic swelling or discomfort and fail to provide substantial physiological improvement or a definitive cure for lymphedema. However, stem cell therapy has garnered notable attention due to its regenerative potential and its capacity to modulate inflammatory processes. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapies exhibit promise in ameliorating BCRL by addressing edema, promoting lymphangiogenesis and mitigating fibrosis. It is shown that MSC therapy promotes the regeneration of autologous lymphatic networks and improves vascular conditions in rodent tail and hindlimb lymphedema models, which offers relief from lymphedema symptoms including limb volume asymmetry and impaired lymphatic drainage. However, currently, due to a lack of a universally recognized or standardized treatment regimen for BCRL, there is a need for additional clinical studies featuring larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods to further investigate this prospective therapeutic modality. The present review aims to provide guidance for further research and therapeutic interventions following the results observed in both preclinical and clinical settings. The present study investigated the pathogenesis of secondary lymphedema, previous advancements in stem cell therapy for this condition and an analysis of persisting challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.