Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600071›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2025

It's Friday, 3 p.m., and the phone rings ... a practical approach to common nephrology consultations-Part 1.

Michael Kolland, Simon Aberger, Nikolaus G O Schreiber, Lisa Kriegl, Balazs Odler, Kathrin Eller, Alexander R Rosenkranz, Alexander H Kirsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael KollandDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Simon AbergerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Nikolaus G O SchreiberDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine 2, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Lisa KrieglDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, ECMM Excellence Center for Clinical Mycology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1977-2196
Balazs OdlerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Kathrin EllerDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6214-5008
Alexander R RosenkranzDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Alexander H KirschDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-7834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This practical approach highlights the importance of timely recognition and management of various nephrological emergencies. The featured conditions pose an extraordinary challenge, since their recognition, timely workup and immediate bedside management are often only roughly pictured in guidelines. This article provides case-based insights and highlights pitfalls with regards to current guidelines on the management of acute conditions frequently managed by nephrologists. The first case, acute allograft dysfunction, underscores the critical need to distinguish between various etiologies of acute kidney injury (AKI) to guide targeted interventions effectively. Case 2 explores the challenges of managing acute infections in kidney transplant recipients, highlighting the necessity of tailoring immunosuppressive therapy, conducting a thorough diagnostic workup, and ensuring timely and adequate treatment. Case 3 focuses on the recognition and management of pulmonary-renal syndrome, emphasizing the importance of initiating serological testing, planning for biopsy, and administering empirical immunosuppressive therapy. In Case 4, a structured and pragmatic approach to diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic microangiopathy, with an emphasis on identifying potential pitfalls to prevent delays in therapy is given. Case 5 focuses AKI in pregnancy, a high-stakes condition that requires prompt and comprehensive diagnostic evaluation to minimize risks to both mother and child. Finally, Case 6 presents a diagnostic and treatment framework for managing suspected infections of a tunneled hemodialysis catheter, aiming to optimize outcomes through early and effective interventions.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryCVC infectionkidney transplantationpregnancythrombotic microangiopathy

Identifiers

PMID40600071
PMCPMC12209848

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.