ArticleCureus2025
Empirical Research of Health Inequalities Between Male and Female Employees of the Hellenic National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim The study attempts to delineate a framework of investigation regarding health inequalities and health-related behaviors among male and female employees of the Hellenic National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision (EOPYY). The pillars of the presented framework are self-perceived health, the presence of chronic diseases, health behaviors, mental well-being, and healthcare utilization. Subject and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 209 employees using a self-administered online questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics (Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, as well as Chi-squared Χ²) and multiple linear regression analysis. Results Men reported better overall health, lower stress levels, and higher quality of life, particularly in dimensions such as physical pain (p=0.001) and mental health (p=0.002), whereas women reported a higher prevalence of chronic diseases and more frequent doctor visits. Women adopted healthier dietary habits and exercised more frequently, while men exhibited higher rates of overweight and obesity (p<0.001). Gender emerged as a significant predictor of both physical and mental health, with men demonstrating more favorable health indicators. Conclusions While health inequalities are gaining global attention, their impact on employees in large public Organizations in Greece remains underexplored. This study generates novel insights to shape strategies such as flexible work policies, improved workplace health programs, and gender equality education, driving a more inclusive and supportive work culture. Practical implications include workplace mental health support, targeted health promotion initiatives, and policies enhancing work-life balance. These measures can reduce gender-related health disparities and improve overall employee well-being and productivity. The findings may inform workplace health policies and promote gender-sensitive interventions in the public sector. The findings may inform workplace health policies and promote gender-sensitive interventions in the public sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.