ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Loneliness and depression among men in Poland: cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mental well-being is defined as subjective feeling characterized by an emotional and cognitive evaluation of one's life that may could lead to high life satisfaction and low levels of negative emotions. Research findings confirm that individuals with an elevated level of loneliness often face mental health issues. Loneliness is recognize as an important potential predictor of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and suicidal thoughts. As mental health concerns are a serious crisis in many countries around the world, it is important to conduct research aimed at identifying those affected by this problem. Due to the reluctance of some men to seek professional health care, there is a need for screening tests to assess the risk of anxiety, depression and level of loneliness in this gender. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of anxiety symptoms, depression, irritability and assess the level of loneliness among men. Methods: The study was conducted on a representative sample of 438 men who completed a survey through an online portal using the Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing (CAWI) technique. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-M) and the UCLA Loneliness Scale (R-UCLA) were used to assess mental well-being. These scales assess only some aspects of mental well-being and are used in screening tests. The average age of the participating men was 45.61 ± 15.64 years. Results: On the HADS-M scale, participants scored an average of 13.91 ± 9.35 points. Anxiety clinically relevant symptoms were identified in 21.91% of the participants on the anxiety subscale, and depressive clinically relevant symptoms in 12.55% on the depression subscale. On the loneliness scale, participants scored an average of 40.50 ± 10.78 points, indicating moderate level of loneliness. A moderately high and very elevated level of loneliness was found in 21.00 and 2.30% of the participants, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, one fifth of the participants experienced anxiety clinically relevant symptoms, and every tenth man demonstrated depressive clinically relevant symptoms. Every fifth man experienced a moderately elevated level of loneliness. The main potential predictor of depression symptoms and higher levels of loneliness was the poor financial situation of the participants and a lack of financial decisiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.