Evidence mapPaperPMID 40600186Full record

ReviewMedical review (2021)2025

Selenium compounds for cancer prevention and therapy - human clinical trial considerations.

Junxuan Lü, Cheng Jiang, Hongbo Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical review (2021), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Junxuan LüDepartment of Pharmacology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2354-7186
Cheng JiangDepartment of Pharmacology, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Hongbo HuCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selenium (Se) is an essential trace mineral crucial for human health. Nearly a dozen human clinical trials with seleno-methionine (SeMet) and selenized-yeast (contains mostly SeMet) for the prevention of non-cutaneous solid organ cancers in North America and European countries conclusively refuted their utility. We have articulated two lessons from these trials: (1) the anti-oxidant hypothesis was tested in inappropriate Se-adequate populations, and (2) the selection of these Se forms was not supported by cell culture and animal efficacy data. Nevertheless, preclinical studies of proximal methylselenol precursors ("methyl Se") have shown many desirable attributes, involving crucial molecules and pathways in cancer epithelial cells, vascular endothelial, immune and inflammatory cells in the tumor microenvironment, for potential use as chemopreventive and therapy agents. Methylseleninic acid and Se-methylselenocysteine are prototypical methyl-Se, yet not equal in their targets. Selenate, selenite and selenious acid had been recently studied in human clinical trials, providing novel safety data, but, missing critical genotoxicity assessments. Given the popularity of Se-enriched foods in China and a continued presence of nutritional Se deficiency in many localities, we discuss recommendations for clinical studies of Se forms for cancer therapy or chemoprevention in China and other countries with similar Se nutrition predicament.

Indexed as

human clinical trialsmethylseleninic acidmethylselenolselenium

Identifiers

PMID40600186
PMCPMC12207204

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.