Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600235›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

Co-designing interventions to improve emergency department discharge communication with youths, parents and healthcare providers: a process evaluation.

Allyson J Gallant, Janet A Curran, Mari Somerville, Lori Wozney, Christine Cassidy, Alannah Delahunty-Pike, Rebecca Mackay, Shannon MacPhee, Emma Burns, Helen Wong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Allyson J GallantFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Room 316-5968 College Street, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Janet A CurranIWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Mari SomervilleIWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Lori WozneyIWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Christine CassidySchool of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Alannah Delahunty-PikeIWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Rebecca MackayIWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Shannon MacPheeIWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Emma BurnsIWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Helen WongFaculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Room 316-5968 College Street, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
Melanie DoyleIWK Health Centre, 5850/5980 University Avenue, P.O. Box 9700, Halifax, Nova Scotia, NS, B3K 6R8, Canada.
Amy PlintCHEO Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road- Research Building 2, 2nd floor, Room 2119, Ottawa, Ontario, ON, Canada, K1H 8L1.
Roger ZemekCHEO Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road- Research Building 2, 2nd floor, Room 2119, Ottawa, Ontario, ON, Canada, K1H 8L1.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emergency departments (ED) are imperfect environments for information exchange. Communication interventions at discharge can lower readmission rates and improve adherence to follow-up. However, these interventions are rarely designed in partnership with ED clinicians, youth and their parents. Objective: To describe a theory-based co-design methodology and corresponding process evaluation to improve discharge communication for two common ED presentations: asthma and minor head injury. Methods: Eligible participants were clinicians who worked in a pediatric ED and parents and youth (aged 12-17) with recent ED experience for either presentation. Co-design teams followed a structured meeting process guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel to facilitate priority setting and intervention design. Process data was captured through meeting recordings, surveys and exit interviews. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data through thematic analysis. Results: Each co-design team included eight members ( Conclusions: A theory-based co-design approach provided a useful structure to partner with youth, parents and ED clinicians to develop discharge communication tools. Consideration is needed when scheduling the timing and length of the co-design meetings to account for the schedules of both service providers and users.

Indexed as

Co-designEmergency careNurse engagementParent engagementPhysician engagementProcess evaluationYouth engagement

Identifiers

PMID40600235
PMCPMC12209945

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.