Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40600443›Full record

SynthesisDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2025

Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol for Sedation in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis.

In Jung Kim, Geun Joo Choi, Hyoung-Chul Oh, Hyun Kang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. RemimazolamPeerJ · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

In Jung KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Geun Joo ChoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyoung-Chul OhDivision of Gastroenterology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun KangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

the National Research Foundation (NRF) NRF-2022R1F1A1074934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSedation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is challenging owing to patient comorbidities and procedural complexity. Remimazolam, a novel benzodiazepine, has potential safety benefits. We aimed to systematically compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and propofol for ERCP sedation through a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA).

methodsWe searched Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-Embase, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared efficacy and safety of remimazolam and propofol in ERCP sedation. Sensitivity analysis and TSA were also performed.

resultsFive RCTs (965 participants) were included. In these trials, remimazolam significantly reduced hypoxia (risk ratio [RR], 0.522; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.348-0.783; Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE], high), hypotension (RR, 0.507; 95% CI 0.396-0.649; GRADE, high), and bradycardia (RR, 0.475; 95% CI 0.308-0.732; GRADE, high). However, it increased tachycardia (RR, 3.363; 95% CI, 1.466-7.714; GRADE, moderate) and body movement (RR, 2.744; 95% CI, 1.216-6.193; GRADE, moderate). Delirium and agitation (RR, 0.586; 95% CI, 0.157-2.179; GRADE, moderate) and completion rate (RR, 1.009; 95% CI, 0.97-1.042; GRADE, moderate) were comparable. Recovery quality was higher in remimazolam group (mean difference, 1.541; 95% CI, 0.057-3.024; GRADE, low). Other outcomes, including induction and recovery times, were similar.

conclusionRemimazolam demonstrated superior safety profile than propofol for ERCP sedation, significantly reducing hypoxia, hypotension, and bradycardia with high certainty evidence and TSA confirmation. Despite the higher incidence of tachycardia and body movement associated with remimazolam, the completion rate and risk of delirium or agitation were similar for both sedatives.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeHypnotics and SedativesProcedural SedationPropofolHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesPropofolremimazolamcholangiopancreatographyendoscopic retrogradehypnotics and sedativespropofolremimazolamsedation

Identifiers

PMID40600443
PMCPMC12511914

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.